Should product marketing report to the CPO when an AI tool is Notion's top discovery channel?

THE SHORT ANSWER

Yes, in the AI era. When Notion asked users how they heard about it, the top answer was an AI tool, at 25.4% of responses, as Rich Holmes reported from Akshay Kothari's survey. Sierra and more than 50 enterprises are drafting Poppy, a standard where a buyer's personal agent reads one file on a company's site before any person talks to it. And about half of ServiceNow's net new business now comes from non-seat pricing, so the outcome definition is product, price, and promise in one sentence. The discovery file, the docs a model reads, the outcome definition, and the onboarding an agent runs are product surfaces that ship with the build. The team that owns positioning, agent-read messaging, pricing and packaging, and the adoption number belongs with the build, under the CPO who owns the whole outcome. Brand and demand stay in marketing.

An AI tool is now the top answer when Notion asks users how they heard about it, 25.4% of responses, as Rich Holmes reported from Akshay Kothari's survey. Sierra and more than 50 enterprises are drafting Poppy, where a buyer's personal agent reads one file on your site before anyone talks to you. And about half of ServiceNow's net new business comes from non-seat pricing, as Jason Lemkin reported, so the outcome definition is product, price, and promise in one sentence.

All of those are product surfaces. They ship with the build or they're wrong. So positioning, agent-read messaging, pricing and packaging, and the adoption number belong in the product org, under the CPO, who owns whether what shipped got bought and used. Brand and demand stay in marketing.

The full argument is part 1 of The Product Marketing Transition. Every part is collected on the series hub, and the CPO side of the case is in The CPO Transition.

SOURCES

THE LONG VERSION

RELATED ANSWERS

Last reviewed 2026-11-05 · 1 min read