Is junior hiring actually falling?

Yes, on two independent readings. Anthropic reported on October 16, 2026 that juniors fell from 27 percent to 9 percent of its new technical hires. Aakash Gupta's October 22 report shows L1 fell from 17 percent of Levels.fyi PM reports in 2022 to 11 percent in 2026, and outside PM hires are down about 45 percent since 2022.

Why is the junior rung a CPO decision and not an HR one?

Because it sets the product org's bench. Every senior PM, director, and CPO learned judgment as an L1 making small calls with a safety net. Stop hiring at the bottom and the senior pipeline runs dry in about six years, and nobody gets the reps that teach them to spot weak output.

How should junior PMs be staffed in an AI-native org?

Paired with seniors, on purpose. Atlassian, per Sherif Mansour, weighted hiring to both ends with less in the middle. Juniors are up to 38 percent more likely to use AI, and seniors are much better at spotting slop, so the pairing is the design.

Does a high engineer-to-PM ratio mean fewer junior PMs?

Not by itself. Anthropic's ratio of about 17 engineers per PM comes from an operating model where managers ship code and agents absorb coordination. The ratio is a reading of that model. Whether to hire at L1 is a separate choice and should be made explicitly.

What should a CPO do this week?

Count product hires from the last 12 months by level. If L1 is zero, take it to the CEO as a written decision, with what the senior bench should look like in six years.

Should Product Orgs Still Hire Junior PMs in the AI Era?

Should product orgs still hire junior PMs when AI does the entry-level work?

THE SHORT ANSWER

Yes, deliberately and in smaller numbers, paired with seniors. The entry rung is thinning everywhere: Anthropic's junior share of new technical hires fell from 27 percent to 9 percent (October 2026), and Aakash Gupta's 2026 report shows L1 fell from 17 to 11 percent of Levels.fyi PM reports. Every future senior PM and CPO starts as an L1, so a product org that hires no one at the bottom has no senior bench in about six years. Atlassian chose the opposite, weighting hiring toward juniors and seniors with fewer in the middle, because juniors use AI more and seniors catch low-quality output.

Yes, on purpose. Fewer than before, paired with seniors, and written down as a decision rather than left to whatever the hiring plan defaulted to.

The default right now is zero. Anthropic's junior share of technical hires went from 27 to 9 percent. Aakash Gupta's data shows the outside door into PM narrowing at L1. Both are reasonable choices for one quarter. Industry-wide, for six years, they erase the bench every product org draws its leaders from.

The full argument, including spans, the new work to redeploy into, and why the ratio is a reading and not a target, is Anthropic Runs 17 Engineers per PM. The Ratio Is the Wrong Question., part 4 of The CPO Transition. For the levels themselves, start with the Product Builder job ladder.

Last reviewed 2026-10-24 · 1 min read

Should product orgs still hire junior PMs when AI does the entry-level work?

SOURCES

THE LONG VERSION

RELATED ANSWERS